Legal Opinion

Williams v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1968PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Humpheeys

Edith Williams sued Elmer F. Smith, an individual, and Mark Shoe Corporation, d/b/a Craig’s Red Cross Shoes, in a common law action for personal injury damages. The defendants filed a plea in abatement alleging plaintiff’s exclusive remedy lay under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Tennessee. The plea in abatement was sustained, and plaintiff Williams has appealed. •

In her declaration plaintiff alleged that she had worked for six years as a saleslady for the defendant company at its retáil shoe store in Chattanooga. On -the morning of September 29, 1967, she was fired by defendant Elmer F.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Heskett v. Fisher Laundry & Cleaners Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Readinger v. GottschallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Echols v. Chattooga Mercantile CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  5. DeCoigne v. Ludlum Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. O'CONNELL v. ChasdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Jablonski v. MultackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Elliott v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Blair v. Allied Maintenance Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. Ortiz Pérez v. Fondo del Seguro del EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API