Legal Opinion

Blair v. Allied Maintenance Corp.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 20, 1988PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOCH, Judge.

This appeal involves a workplace altercation between an employee and his supervisor. The employee filed an action for assault, outrageous conduct, and breach of implied contract in the Circuit Court for Rutherford County against his supervisor and his employer. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, stating that the employee’s suit was preempted by federal labor law and that his remedies were limited to those available under the Workers’ Compensation Law or the collective bargaining agreement. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Miller v. WillbanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. White v. Methodist Hospital SouthCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Newsom v. Textron AerostructuresCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Shoemake v. Omniquip International Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API