Legal Opinion

Champlin Refining Co. v. Dugan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1928No. 17927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.

The parties to this action appear here in the reverse order to that in the district court, and for convenience will be referred to as they appeared there.

Plaintiffs brought an action for an injunction against the defendant, alleging the plaintiffs were the owners of certain residence property in the city of Enid; that it was located within the exclusive residential district of that city; and that the defendant had commenced to build and intended to operate “n public drive-in filling station on a lot joining the property of one of the plaintiffs, H. H. Dugan; and that said filling station…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. City of Muskogee v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fort Smith v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Boudinot v. State Ex Rel. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Sipe v. DaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Bell v. BrockmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Cities Service Oil Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API