Legal Opinion

Boudinot v. State Ex Rel. Cannon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1959No. 38527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

This action was instituted by defendant in error, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Joe Cannon, hereafter referred to as “plaintiff”, against plaintiff in error, Mary C. Boudinot, hereafter referred to as “defendant”, to enjoin defendant from keeping a large number of cats on her residential property in Muskogee County, Oklahoma. It was alleged that the noise and odor arising from keeping said cats created a public nuisance.

In her answer, defendant alleged that she at no time kept on her premises more than forty cats; that the cats were “kept safely, securely and in an extremely…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. Edmundson, Adm'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Simons v. FahnestockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Truttman v. City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Smith v. SteinraufSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Champlin Refining Co. v. DuganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lazy S Ranch Properties v. Valero Terminaling and DistributionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. Harrison v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. STATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  4. STATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API