Legal Opinion
Cities Service Oil Co. v. Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1933No. 720PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
The chancellor below, at the instance of the owner of an adjacent home, enjoined the use of a comer lot for filling station purposes. The- oil company appeals on the ground that the facts specifically found do not warrant the conclusion drawn. ,
The appellant purchased a residence property in the town of Pawhuska, which has a population of around 5,000 people, but which has no zoning ordinance. The oil company proposed to wreck the residence and garage on the lots purchased and erect thereon a modern fireproof filling station, with the necessary drives, buried tanks,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Port of Seattle v. Oregon & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Northwestern Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Waggoner Estate v. Wichita CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1938