Kentel v. Laidlaw

The plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries and property damage alleged to have been received by him in a collision of his automobile with that of the defendant. The trial judge denied eight of the defendant’s requests for rulings and findings of fact, and found gen*88erally for the plaintiff. The defendant, in his brief and in his argument before this division, contends that the Court as matter of law should have ruled that, (1) the plaintiff was contribuíorily negligent; (2) that the plaintiff’s automobile was illegally registered, and (3) that the court erred in its requests numbered…