Legal Opinion
Daris v. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 26, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries and for damage to property sustained at about nine o’clock in the forenoon of December 5, 1917, by the plaintiff’s intestate through collision between an automobile, which he was driving, with a trolley car of the defendant. The collision occurred at the junction of two public ways, Boden Lane and West Central Street. The automobile was being driven on Boden Lane, on a descending grade toward West Central Street. On the side of that street the defendant maintained two tracks. A trolley car was coming on the track nearer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Halloran v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Salisbury v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Isaacson v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Donoghue v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Anti v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Clay v. Pope & Cottle Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Di Rienzo v. GoldfarbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.