Application of Tanczyn
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable over the prior art claims 10, 12, and 13, the only remaining claims in appellant’s application for a patent on an “Alloy Steel and Products.”
The appealed claims relate to wrought and polished stainless steel products, such as sheet, strip, wire and the like, which are substantially free from surface imperfections such as black spots, blisters, pits and inclusion lines. According to appellant, these imperfections,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Pittsburgh Iron & Steel Foundries Co. v. Seaman-Sleeth Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Becket v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- In Re SteenbockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- In Re CooperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Arthur L. ScottCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of George E. Linnert and Ronald H. EspyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Jack Raymond Bird, Geoffrey William Meetham and Marcus Alan WheelerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956
- Application of Roger A. Perkins and Max L. PochonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.