Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Application of Jack Raymond Bird, Geoffrey William Meetham and Marcus Alan Wheeler

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 13, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Appellants filed an application titled “Nickel Chromium Base Alloy Products,” serial No. 855,076 on November 24,1959,1 and have appealed from an adverse decision on patentability with respect to claims 1-10 therein. The Board of Appeals reversed the examiner’s holding of unpatentability over the art of record as to the alloy defined by claims 11 and 12.

The invention is directed to articles of alloy compositions of which the main components are chromium, cobalt, and nickel, with minor percentages of manganese and silicon, and three elements which function as hardeners, aluminum,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  4. Application of Eric D. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hunger-Ford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Application of Roger A. Perkins and Max L. PochonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Application of Jack Raymond Bird, Geoffrey William Meetham and Marcus Alan WheelerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  5. In re ArkleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API