Legal Opinion
Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. Watson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 21, 1956No. Civ. A. 1699-54PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURRAN, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff, Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc., against the defendant, Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, ■ pursuant to Title 35, Section 145 of the United States Code, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue to the plaintiff letters patent, containing Claims 5, 6, 7 and 8 of an application, Serial No. 187,370, entitled “Titanium Alloy”, filed September 28, 1950, by Robert I. Jaffee, Horace R. Ogden and Daniel L. Maykuth. This application has been assigned to Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc., plaintiff herein. Claims 5 and 6 were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Klein v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Turrill v. Michigan, S. & NIR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1864
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- International Nickel Company v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents, and Luther H. Hodges, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
- Application of Roger A. Perkins and Max L. PochonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965