Legal Opinion
Gibson v. BoPar Dock Co. Corp.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided November 14, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-0069-BPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN M. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff, Sarah P. Gibson (“Gibson”), brings this derivative action suit naming Cecil W. Bolling, Roger C. Viers, Paul R. Ison, and Ambrose Branch Coal Company as defendants (collectively, “Defendants”). BoPar Dock Company Corporation (“BoPar”) is also named in the suit as a defendant. Defendants Bolling, Viers, and Ison served as officers and directors of BoPar. Defendant Ambrose Branch is a business similar to BoPar, of which Boll-ing, Viers, and Ison also act as officers and directors.
Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Doctor v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Diaz v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ono v. ItoyamaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Hildebrand v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Bishop (In Re Bishop)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.