Legal Opinion
Ono v. Itoyama
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 27, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-1650 (JCL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LIFLAND, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on motion by defendants Eitaro Itoyama (“Itoyama”), Shin Nihon Kanko Kogyo Co., Ltd. (“Shin Nihon Japan”) and Shinnihon Kanko Kogyo (USA) Co., Inc. (“Shinnihon USA”) to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) or for transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Plaintiffs Keiko Ono (“Ono”) and Atesse Co., Ltd. (“Atesse”) oppose the motion.
BACKGROUND
This action was commenced by plaintiffs Ono and Atesse on June 28, 1994. Ono is a legal, permanent resident of the United States residing in New York City.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Barr v. WackmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gabriel v. PrebleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Levitt v. Riddell Sports, Inc. (In Re MacGregor Sporting Goods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. ExxonMobil Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Bartlett v. OverslaughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- COR Marketing & Sales, Inc. v. Greyhawk Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.