Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 2008No. 06-35838PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
George Diaz, sometime shareholder of Digimarc Corporation, filed this action derivatively on the corporation’s behalf. Diaz alleges that the individual defendants, who are current and former officers and directors of Digimarc, breached their fiduciary duties to the corporation and its shareholders by issuing misleading financial statements and misrepresenting the business and prospects of Digimarc in violation of California corporations law and section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7243. The district court dismissed his Sarbanes-Oxley claim on the grounds…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Blue Science Solutions, LLC v. Clarentis Holding, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
- CSDS Asset Management LLC v. Sama USA 2 LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London v. Zurich American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Entourage Investment Group, LLC v. TV4 Entertainment, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.