Legal Opinion
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 23, 2015No. Slip Op. 15-07; Court 12-00020PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
POGUE, Senior Judge:
This action is again before the court following a second redetermination and a voluntary partial third redetermination. In the third redetermination, the Depart.ment of Commerce (“Commerce”) reaffirmed the second redetermination of the final results of the antidumping (“AD”) duty investigation of multilayered wood flooring from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or'“China”). 1
Still at issue are the AD duty rates assigned to eight separate rate respondents—the Plaintiffs and Plaintiff-Interve-nors here (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 2 —for the underlying…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Husteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Maverick Tube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Solarworld Americas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.