Legal Opinion
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 15, 2017No. 2015-1899; 2015-1901; 2015-1903; 2015-1904PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s antidumping-duty investigation of multilayered wood flooring imports from the People’s Republic of China. The appellants here are Chinese entities that Commerce found had demonstrated their independence from the Chinese government and so deserved a “separate” antidumping-duty rate, not the so-called China-wide rate that applies to entities that had not shown their independence from the Chinese government. Commerce did not individually investigate appellants to determine firm-specific dumping margins. Instead, it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Changshou Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Tung Mung Development Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- National Knitwear & Sportswear Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Primesource Building Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.