Wolf v. Globe Liquor Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for an accounting or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement as to certain allegations therein. The motions can best be considered by first summarizing the allegations of the complaint, and testing them by the provisions of the new Chancery Court Rules.
According to the complaint, in July, 1937, plaintiff, an *287individual with a sales executive background, entered into a contract with the defendant, a single stockholder corporation. The corporate officers and directors are the nominees of the sole stockholder. Under the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glanding v. Industrial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1945
- Bird v. Wilmington Society of the Fine ArtsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
- Goldsborough v. County Tr. Co. of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Selz v. BuelIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Tharp v. St. Georges Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maull v. StrokesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
- ARTESIAN WATER COMPANY v. LynchCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
- Wolf v. Globe Liquor Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
- Equitable Trust Co. v. GallagherCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948