Legal Opinion

Goldsborough v. County Tr. Co. of Md.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 3, 1941No. [No. 39, October Term, 1941.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The appellant, once attorney for the appellee, sues in equity for an accounting of commissions alleged to be due to him, by agreement, on amounts paid to the client on j udgments entered by the attorney, for a discovery of amounts so paid, and for an injunction to restrain foreclosure of an overdue mortgage by him and his wife to the client until the state of accounts between them has been ascertained. A demurrer to a second amended bill of complaint was sustained and the bill dismissed; and the appeal has been entered from that action.

The- bill, filed on January 21, 1941, avers that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. PinderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  2. Union Passenger Railway Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  3. Becker v. Frederick W. Lipps Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. Zalis v. OrmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Musch v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Ver Brycke v. Ver BryckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. New Baltimore City Board of School CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Nagel v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Eastern States Corp. v. EislerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API