Legal Opinion

ARTESIAN WATER COMPANY v. Lynch

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 4, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVEL, Vice Chancellor:

Laird, Bissell and Meeds, Incorporated, a defendant to this action, has moved to dismiss the complaint herein as to it. 1 Such cause of action is based on an alleged act of negligence on the part of said defendant which occurred on or about January 12, 1960 when a share of Artesian Water Company due the individual plaintiff, a resident of Wilmington, was delivered to a man of the same name residing in North East, Maryland. The basis for the corporate defendant’s motion is that plaintiffs’ claim against such firm is barred either by the Delaware three year statute of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  2. Cochran v. F. H. Smith Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  3. Bush v. Hillman Land Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
  4. Bush v. Hillman Land Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
  5. Maull v. StrokesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harold Kraft v. Wisdomtree Investments, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  2. Isaacson, Stolper & Co. v. Artisan's Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. Whittington v. Dragon Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Ontario Hydro v. Zallea Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API