Legal Opinion

Maull v. Strokes

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 11, 1949PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, Chancellor:

John J. Stokes, the defendant, is a contractor and builder and received certain sums of money from Louis C. Maull under a contract to build a house and garage for him at Lewes. Maull had directed certain work done which was not covered by the contract, and Stokes subsequently filed a mechanic’s lien suit in the Superior Court for Sussex County seeking to establish a lien on Maull’s property for a balance alleged to be due.

The question is whether this court can compel Stokes to account to Maull for the expenditure of the moneys received, and thereby determine the rights…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kane v. BloodgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
  2. Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Glanding v. Industrial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1945
  4. State v. Tabasso Homes, Inc.New York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1942
  5. Theisen v. HoeyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Irwin & Leighton, Inc. v. W.M. Anderson Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
  2. Key Agency v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Stevens v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Martin (In Re Martin )United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Hiller & Skoglund, Inc. v. Atlantic Creosoting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API