Glanding v. Industrial Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Terry, Judge,
delivering the opinion of the majority of the court:
It is contended by certain of our associates that the court below was without jurisdiction because there exists a complete and adequate remedy at law. In support of their reasoning they rely upon the existence of two statutes: First—Section 4367, Revised Code of Delaware 1935— which in part is as follows:
“Provided, that the Chancellor shall not have power to determine any matter wherein sufficient remedy may be had by common law, or statute, before any other Court, or jurisdiction, of this State; but that where matters,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fox v. WhartonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1878
- Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. DonahoeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1899
- Hollis v. KinneyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Beeson v. ElliottCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1831
- St. James' Church v. WalkerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1825
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Americas Mining Corp. v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- DiGiacobbe v. SestakSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- McMahon v. New Castle AssociatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
- duPont v. duPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
- Harman v. Masoneilan International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.