Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Burgum v. Hooker

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1957No. 7680PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMSON, Chief Justice.

This is an action by the State of North Dakota, on the relation of Leslie R. Bur-gum, Attorney General, to enjoin the defendants from conducting a usurious, small loan business in the City of Fargo. Upon a verified complaint and fifteen affidavits alleging that said business was conducted in gross violation of the usury statutes of the State of North Dakota, against the public policy of the State and to the injury of the unfortunate people forced by necessitous circumstances to make such loans, the court, on the 5th day of December, 1956, granted an ex parte order…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Ladner v. Siegel (No. 4)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State v. EhrlickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of New Orleans v. Liberty Shop, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. California v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Heitkamp v. Family Life Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API