Mason-Dixon Resorts, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CASTILLE.
This is a direct appeal filed by Mason-Dixon Resorts, L.P. (“appellant”), from the decision of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (the “Board”) which awarded a Category 3 slot machine license to Interve-nor Woodlands Fayette, L.L.C. (“Woodlands”). We affirm.
Background
In July 2004, the General Assembly enacted the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (the “Act”), 4 Pa.C.S. §§ 1101-1904. The Act provides, inter alia, a statutory framework for legalized slot machine gaming at a limited number of licensed facilities throughout the Commonwealth.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Riverwalk Casino, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pocono Manor Investors, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
3Cited by5 opinions
- SugarHouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re:Trust of Trust of Scaife, S. Appeal of: TribSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Mkt. East Assoc., LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- PA Waste Transfer, LLC v. Evans Disposal, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- SugarHouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016