Legal Opinion

Mason-Dixon Resorts, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

This is a direct appeal filed by Mason-Dixon Resorts, L.P. (“appellant”), from the decision of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (the “Board”) which awarded a Category 3 slot machine license to Interve-nor Woodlands Fayette, L.L.C. (“Woodlands”). We affirm.

Background

In July 2004, the General Assembly enacted the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (the “Act”), 4 Pa.C.S. §§ 1101-1904. The Act provides, inter alia, a statutory framework for legalized slot machine gaming at a limited number of licensed facilities throughout the Commonwealth.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Riverwalk Casino, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Pocono Manor Investors, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SugarHouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. In Re:Trust of Trust of Scaife, S. Appeal of: TribSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Mkt. East Assoc., LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. PA Waste Transfer, LLC v. Evans Disposal, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. SugarHouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API