Legal Opinion

Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2007No. 28 & 29 MM 2007PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

Petitioners in these matters challenge the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board’s (“Board”) grant of a slot machine license to PITG Gaming, LLC (“PITG”). For the following reasons, we affirm.

The genesis of these matters lies in the Legislature’s July of 2004 enactment of the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (“Act”). The Act established the Board, granting it general jurisdiction over all gaming and related activities including the licensing of gaming facilities.

Under the Act, the Legislature provided for legalized slot machine gaming at a limited…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Pocono Manor Investors, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Casne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Agostino v. Township of CollierCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. SugarHouse HSP Gaming, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Riverlife Task Force v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API