Legal Opinion
SugarHouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 29, 2016No. 175 EM 2014, 176 EM 2014PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion, the Order of the Gaming Control Board Court is hereby AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings on the following issues. First, regarding the question of the eligibility of Stadium Casino, LLC (“Stadium”) to apply for a Category 2 slot machine license under 4 Pa.C.S. § 1304(a), the Board is directed to consider whether Watche Manoukian, as an affiliate of Stadium, was eligible to apply for a Category 1 slot machine license at the time Stadium applied…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wirth v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Fumo v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Johnson v. American StandardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- SugarHouse HSP Gaming, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In Re: Appointment of a Receiver for the Chester Upland SD ~ Appeal of: PA Cyber Charter SchoolCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- J.J. Holloway v. PA State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Market East Assoc. v. PA Gaming Control Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Stadium Casino RE LLC, Pet v. Pa Gaming Control BdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.