Legal Opinion

Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 2011No. 106 MM 2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

In this appeal, we consider whether Appellee, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (the “Board”), properly approved a Category 3 slot machine license application submitted by Intervenor, Valley Forge Convention Center Partners, L.P. (“Valley Forge Partners”), pursuant to the Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (the “Gaming Act”), 4 Pa.C.S. *372§§ 1101-1904. Upon careful review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the relevant law, we determine that the Board properly approved the Category 3 slot machine license, and we affirm.

On June 29, 2007, Valley Forge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riverwalk Casino, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Pocono Manor Investors, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Allardice v. McCainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re GonzalezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. SugarHouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Mason-Dixon Resorts, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Gen. Motors, LLC v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational AffairsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API