Horton v. Jack
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. J. E. Prewett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, upon this and upon the former appeals, reported in 37 Pac. Rep. 652, and 115 Cal. 29.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
—This is the third appeal in this case. On the first appeal, the nonsuit as to the defendant corporation was affirmed, but the judgment in favor of defendant Jack was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial between the plaintifE and said defendant. (Horlon v. Jade, 115 Cal. 39.) The second trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and on appeal from said judgment and order denying a new trial they were reversed and the cause again remanded. The last trial was also by a jury, and a verdict was rendered for the defendant. From the judgment entered on said verdict, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Liptrot v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
- Levy v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Mason v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Miller v. StruvenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.