Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. There have been three trials of the case, in the first of which a jury found a verdict for plaintiff, which was set aside and a new trial granted by the trial judge; in the second á motion for a nonsuit was granted and the order was reversed by this court (Kramm v. Stockton Elec. R. R. Co., 3 Cal. App. 606, [86 Pac. 738, 903]); in the last trial a jury again found a verdict for plaintiff and the trial judge set aside this verdict and granted the motion…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jackson v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Tampa Water Works Co. v. MuggeSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Ogando v. Carquinez Grammar School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.