Legal Opinion

Kleinman v. Saminsky

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 22, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Justice:

This is an appeal from the approval by the Chancellor of an agreement settling a derivative action brought on behalf of the ten Keystone Custodian Funds (hereafter “the Funds”) against the Trustee of the Funds, Keystone Custodian Funds, Inc., (hereafter “Keystone”), its directors, and The Keystone Company of Boston (hereafter “Keystone of Boston”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of' Keystone, and the sole underwriter of certificates of participation in the Funds. Both corporate defendants are Delaware corporations.

The Funds are ten common law trusts created in 1935. Each fund is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  3. Rome v. ArcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  4. Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  5. Acampora v. BirklandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kleinman v. SaminskySupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  2. Hoffman v. DannCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1964
  3. Lifmann v. AronsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API