Saxe v. Brady
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
Plaintiffs became investors in 1952 in Fundamental Investors, Inc. ("Fund”), a Delaware corporation registered as an open-end investment company under the provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940. They have brought this action on *476its behalf against its directors, investment adviser, and parent of its investment adviser.
Plaintiffs charge that the fees paid to Fund’s investment adviser pursuant to a contract whereby the latter receives annually an amount equal to of 1% of the average daily net assets of the Fund are “unreasonable, excessive and an illegal waste and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Beard v. ElsterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Beard v. ElsterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Schiff v. RKO Pictures Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.