Legal Opinion

Rome v. Archer

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 14, 1964PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

197 A.2d 49 (1964)

Marjorie T. ROME et al., Objectants below, Appellants,

v.

Norman H. ARCHER, Plaintiff below, Appellee, and

Walter L. Morgan et al., Defendants below, Appellees.

Molly LAYMAN, Objectant below, Appellant,

v.

Norman H. ARCHER, Plaintiff below, Appellee, and

Walter L. Morgan et al., Defendants below, Appellees.

Ruth BLUM, Objectant below, Appellant,

v.

Norman H. ARCHER, Plaintiff below, Appellee, and

Walter L. Morgan et al., Defendants below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

January 14, 1964.

F. Alton Tybout, Wilmington, and Edwin P. Rome, of Blank, Rudenko, Klaus & Rome, Philadelphia,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  4. Cohen v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Barkan v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Polk v. GoodSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. In re Trulia, Inc. Stockholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  4. Nottingham Partners v. DanaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Alabama By-Products Corp. v. Cede & Co. Ex Rel. Shearson Lehman Bros.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API