Legal Opinion

Kleinman v. Saminsky

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 22, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

200 A.2d 572 (1964)

Sidney C. KLEINMAN and Janice R. Kleinman, Objectors-below, Appellants,

v.

Hyman SAMINSKY and Betty Siegel, Trustee for Joan Siegel, Plaintiffs-below Appellees, and

Charles C. Abbott et al., Defendants-below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

April 22, 1964.

Frank J. Miller, of Walker, Miller & Wakefield, Wilmington, and Arthur T. Susman, Chicago, Ill., for objectors.

William E. Taylor, Jr., Wilmington, and Abraham L. Pomerantz and William E. Haudek, of Pomerantz, Levy, Haudek & Block, New York City, for plaintiffs.

James M. Tunnell, Jr., and William S. Megonigal, Jr., of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  3. Rome v. ArcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  4. Acampora v. BirklandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
  5. Saminsky v. AbbottCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Investors Bancorp, Inc. Stockholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  2. Neponsit Investment Co. v. AbramsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. Hoffman v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  4. Trainor v. BernerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  5. Hoffman v. DannCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API