Legal Opinion

Acampora v. Birkland

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 10, 1963No. Civ. A. 7038PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, District Judge.

The plaintiff brings this derivative action as a shareholder and on behalf of Financial Industrial Fund, Inc., (Fund). The defendants (in addition to Fund), are Financial Industrial Fund Management Corporation (Management), and Financial Programs, Inc. (Programs). Also named are the principal officers of Management and Programs and the officers and directors of Fund (affiliated and non-affiliated with Management).

The facts herein are, for the most part, undisputed, and it is deemed unnecessary to formulate and enter formal findings and conclusions. The findings and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  2. Virginia v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  4. Dutton v. . WillnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Aldred Inv. Trust v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wellman v. DickinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  3. Rome v. ArcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  4. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API