Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Bryant v. McLeod
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 5, 1994No. 94-394PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The State of Arkansas, by and through the office of the Attorney General, successfully prosecuted a claim against the appellees, Cortland C. McLeod, and Neil E. Gregory, for committing violations of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), codified in Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-101 et seq.; however, the trial court denied its request for attorneys’ fees and for reimbursement of an expert-witness fee. The State appeals, and finding no merit in its arguments, we affirm the chancellor.
On March 11, 1992, the Attorney General brought an action against several…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- McCoy v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Neely v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- American Casualty Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Stephens v. Arkansas School for the BlindSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Richard's Honda YamahaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.