Legal Opinion

Neely v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 13, 1994No. CR 94-64PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Stephanie Diane Neely was convicted of aggravated robbery, theft of property, and kidnapping. She contends the Trial Court erred by allowing the State to amend its information at the close of her trial, finding sufficient evidence to convict her of kidnapping, and failing to consider the minimum sentences provided in Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-501, as amended by Act 550 of 1993, for habitual offenders. Our holding is that Ms. Neely was not prejudiced by the amendment of the information. We hold the evidence of kidnapping was sufficient, and as the crime was committed before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dollar v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Frensley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Baumgarner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Bryant v. McLeodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Nance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Rosario v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API