State v. Maddox
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals her convictions for intimidation, harassment, and disorderly conduct. She argues that the trial court erred in denying her right to waive jury trial. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial.
Defendant was charged, and the matter was set for trial. Before trial, the state requested a jury trial. Defendant orally objected and asserted the right under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, to waive a jury trial. The state replied that the constitution had been amended by the enactment of Ballot Measure 40, which, among other things, provided that the state…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Stelts v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. YsasagaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by9 opinions
- Durham v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Dinsmore v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. BruningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Williams v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.