Legal Opinion
Durham v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 8, 2002No. 9902-92117; A109538PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
This is the fourth action that plaintiff has brought against her former employer, the City of Portland, and her former supervisor, Robert Phillips. In this action, plaintiff alleged that the City had discriminated against her because she was a woman and that it had retaliated against her for complaining about its employment practices. She also alleged that Phillips had assaulted her. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs assault claim and granted summary judgment on her discrimination and retaliation claims. We affirm.
In 1994, plaintiff began work as a human resource analyst in the City’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Yeager v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Qwest Corp. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Lansford v. Georgetown Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Aguirre v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Adamson v. WorldCom Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.