Legal Opinion

Stelts v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1985No. TC C83-01-30170 CA A28588 SC S30721PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The issue is whether one who pleads guilty without knowledge of his constitutional right of confrontation must, in order to obtain post-conviction relief, establish that he would not have pleaded guilty had he been aware of his right. We hold that he does not have to establish such “prejudice.”

In June, 1979, plaintiff pleaded guilty in district court to a charge of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicants. Judgment of conviction was entered on that plea. He took no appeal. In January, 1983, after the time for appeal had expired, he commenced this case under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. WoodleyOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. EsplinOregon Supreme Court · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API