State v. Baker
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
This original mandamus proceeding 1 presents the question whether ORS 136.001(1), which purports to grant to the state the right in criminal prosecutions to insist on a jury trial, even if the defendant chooses to waive such a trial, is constitutional. We hold that the statute violates Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution.
This proceeding arises out of a criminal case in which defendant-adverse party Toni Jean Baker (defendant) is charged by a five-count Clackamas County indictment with the felony offenses of attempted aggravated murder, kidnapping in the first degree, criminal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Harrell / WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HessOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.