Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1999No. CC CR980-1016; SC S45664PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This original mandamus proceeding 1 presents the question whether ORS 136.001(1), which purports to grant to the state the right in criminal prosecutions to insist on a jury trial, even if the defendant chooses to waive such a trial, is constitutional. We hold that the statute violates Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution.

This proceeding arises out of a criminal case in which defendant-adverse party Toni Jean Baker (defendant) is charged by a five-count Clackamas County indictment with the felony offenses of attempted aggravated murder, kidnapping in the first degree, criminal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. Harrell / WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. HessOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API