Legal Opinion

State v. Ysasaga

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1997No. 9505-33304; CA A91929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375, burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and attempted assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175; ORS 161.405(1). He assigns error to the admission of evidence of a prior assault conviction and the denial of a demurrer challenging the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of Ballot Measure 11. We affirm.

At the time of the incident underlying defendant’s convictions, defendant and the victim had an on-going relationship and had had a child together. Defendant previously had been convicted of assaulting the victim,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. SprowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Williams v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API