Legal Opinion
Taylor v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 13, 2006No. 05-1045 CPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Before this court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s pro se complaint1 pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). In a January 28, 2005 order, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (“district court”) transferred plaintiff’s complaint to this court. Plaintiff, in his transfer complaint, makes a variety of allegations relating to claims of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) (“Title VII”),…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Wright v. Foreign Service Grievance BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Munoz v. MabusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.