Legal Opinion
Munoz v. Mabus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 27, 2010No. 08-16374PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Ysauro Munoz appeals an adverse summary judgment ruling on two claims arising from a single dispute over whether a Title VII predetermination settlement agreement required the Navy to provide him a particular type of training. Munoz foremost brings a breach of contract action, over which the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and we therefore vacate summary judgment on Count 1 and remand with instructions to dismiss. Munoz also alleges that the denial of training was in retaliation for filing his underlying age and race discrimination…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- E.O.H.C. v. Secretary United States DepartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Anderson v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Bowen v. M. Caratan, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Equal Employment Opportunities Commission v. La Rana Hawaii, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.