Arbelaez v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & OPINION
DAMICH, Judge:
Plaintiff Omaira Arbelaez has filed a complaint, pro se, alleging several causes of action against the government: 1) “trover and conversion”; 2) “destruction”; 3) “unlawful interference with contracts”; 4) “unlawful retention”; and 5) “breach of duty.” 1 Compl. ¶¶ 9-10, 19 — 42. These claims stem from the seizure of certain property by the FBI in conjunction with the 1993 arrest of Ms. Arbe-laez’s husband, Alejandro Ordonez, on federal drug charges. Compl. Ex. 9; A13-14.2 Ms. Arbelaez has styled her complaint “as a third party seeking to recover an alleged…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Ingram v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.