Legal Opinion

Arbelaez v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 23, 2010No. 09-505CPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER & OPINION

DAMICH, Judge:

Plaintiff Omaira Arbelaez has filed a complaint, pro se, alleging several causes of action against the government: 1) “trover and conversion”; 2) “destruction”; 3) “unlawful interference with contracts”; 4) “unlawful retention”; and 5) “breach of duty.” 1 Compl. ¶¶ 9-10, 19 — 42. These claims stem from the seizure of certain property by the FBI in conjunction with the 1993 arrest of Ms. Arbe-laez’s husband, Alejandro Ordonez, on federal drug charges. Compl. Ex. 9; A13-14.2 Ms. Arbelaez has styled her complaint “as a third party seeking to recover an alleged…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Ingram v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API