Legal Opinion

Kanaly v. State by and Through Janklow

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1985No. 14716PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

This is an appeal from an order granting defendants-appellees partial summary judgment. The trial court held that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to the constitutionality of Senate Bill 221/1984 and that said bill did not violate provisions of the Enabling Act. Senate Bill 221/1984, now found in 1984 S.D.Sess.Laws ch. 138 and hereinafter referred to as S.B. 221, closed the University of South Dakota-Springfield (USD/S) and transferred control of the facilities to the Board of Charities and Corrections without consideration. We affirm in part, reverse in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Andrus v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stumes v. BloombergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Parsons v. South Dakota Lottery CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wyatt v. KundertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Accounts Management, Inc. v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API