Legal Opinion
Stumes v. Bloomberg
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1] Norman Stumes (Stumes) appeals the dismissal of his action against certain elected and appointed officials who played a part in either the enactment of, or in the implementation of, Chapter 140 of the 1995 South Dakota Session Laws (State). We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2] House Bill 1359 was passed by both houses on the last day of the Seventieth Session of the South Dakota Legislature. Governor Janklow signed the bill into law on March 30, 1995. See 1995 S.D. Sess. L. ch. 140. This bill was a special appropriations bill that appropriated money to the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Jenner v. DooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Thompson v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Hansen v. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.