Legal Opinion

Andrus v. Utah

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 30, 1980No. 78-1522PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The State of Utah claims the right to select extremely valuable oil shale lands located within federal grazing districts in lieu of and as indemnification for original school land grants of significantly lesser value that were frustrated by federal pre-emption, or private entry, prior to survey. The question presented is whether the Secretary of the Interior is obliged to accept Utah’s selections of substitute tracts of the *502same size as the originally designated sections even though there is a gross disparity between the value of the original grants and the selected substitutes. We hold that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Cooper v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. United States v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Wyoming v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hill v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Department of State Lands v. PettiboneMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API