Legal Opinion

Le Mesnager v. Variel

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1904No. L.A. No. 1516PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This action was brought to obtain a decree vacating and setting aside a judgment theretofore obtained by the defendant against plaintiff for the sum of $4,298, and restraining defendant from enforcing said judgment. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, the plaintiff having declined to amend/ judgment went for defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

It appears from the complaint in this action that the plaintiff was the surviving executor of the will of Miguel Leonis, deceased, and that the original action was brought against him by the defendant herein to recover…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Eichhoff v. EichhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Blondeau v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. White v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. In Re American Fidelity CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API