Legal Opinion

White v. McLaughlin

California Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1900No. S.F. No. 4915PublishedCited by 34 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa, Cruz County granting letters of administration and from an order denying a new trial. Lucas P. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Sullivan & Sullivan, Theo. J. Roche, and Cassin & Lucas, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Edward White, a petitioner- for letters, of administration of the estate of James McNeil, deceased, appeals from an order granting letters of administration to Frank McLaughlin, and also from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We shall not consider various objections made by respondent to the consideration of these appeals, but will proceed with a discussion on the merits of the appeal from the order appointing McLaughlin administrator.

James McNeil died intestate on April 1, 1906. Margaret McNeil, claiming to be his surviving wife, requested the superior court of Santa Cruz County…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People ex rel. Schwartz v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API