Commonwealth of Australia v. Radio Corporation of America
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:
The sole issue before the court on this appeal is whether the district court below was correct in holding that the civil action brought pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146 by appellant as a party dissatisfied with a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences on the question of priority, was commenced out of time under the terms of Section 146. In so holding the court granted appellee’s motions for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) and for summary judgment under Fed.R. Civ.P. 56. We reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
On September 11, 1962, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eddy W. Eckey v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Sperry Rand Corporation, in 13,678 v. Knapp-Monarch Company, in 13,679Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Application of Arthur L. ReeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Sperry Rand Corp. v. KNAPP-MONARCH COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- In re MossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ben Gold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Shaffer Tool Works v. JOY MANUFACTURING COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
- Urologix, Inc. v. PROSTALUND ABDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002