Legal Opinion

Eddy W. Eckey v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 25, 1959No. 14964_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The question here is whether the Commissioner of Patents has the authority to extend the sixty-day period, fixed by Rule 304 of the Rules of Practice of the Patent Office, 37 C.F.R. § 1.304 (Supp. 1959), 35 U.S.C.Appendix, 1 for the filing of suits in the District Court under Section 145 of Title 35, U.S.Code. Rule 304 was adopted pursuant to Section 145, which authorizes the Commissioner to “appoint” the time within which suits under that section may be brought. 2

Plaintiff-appellant’s complaint under Section 145 was filed in the District Court one day late, i. e., on the sixty-first day…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Michael Ben GravesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Commissariat a L'EnErgiE Atomique v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Application of Arthur L. ReeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Richard C. Loshbough v. Kenneth C. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Commonwealth of Australia v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API