Application of Arthur L. Reese
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant has (1) filed a petition for rehearing of our order granting the motion of the Patent Office to dismiss his appeal on the ground that it was not timely filed and (2) moves to vacate said order.
The petitioner argues, as he did in the opposition to the Patent Office motion, that he is entitled to the “benefit” of Patent Office Rule 197 (b). The lengthy petition is mostly devoted to arguing why appellant is entitled to that “benefit.”
Assuming, arguendo, that appellant is entitled to whatever benefit is to be had from Rule 197(b), though he admits that he has not technically come within…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eddy W. Eckey v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Buchner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Michael Ben GravesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Commonwealth of Australia v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In re PriestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In Re McNeil-PPC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Application of Arthur L. ReeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.